How to understand the history of the nobility of

 In late February I Some civilians as well. In this regard, I have not been justified. passage of time, I responsibly say that I was saying that can not, without it, meaning may be quite different. Of course, Sohu's editorial consideration or understanding of their own, I fully respect. Furthermore, I also considered the size of a Go.
Why do I say history is an aristocracy of learning? I think, a liberal arts foundation of history (like mathematics is a science, like basis), is a profound knowledge, there their own norms, moral principles, to the hard work of studying history, but also has a strong understanding, and sometimes seems unattainable; Furthermore, the reality of history, worse function, this knowledge generally does not make much money. on the hundreds of forum, my book can be printed tens of thousands of copies at once, which was previously unthinkable. Even in the Lecture Room, large print run of books is often not a history book. I said that history has a noble nature, and some self-deprecating elements.
I have a low-key life, what does not compete with others, more than anything. This is a childhood habit, my grandfather was a landlord before liberation (just more to it than others, far less than I Today, a good life), in the sixties and seventies, the great title long-term impact.
As I was not concerned with aristocratic friends, I am sure that I am not detached from generation to generation with the nobility, my ancestors have not received the special grace of the Qing dynasty, the Qing Dynasty did not suffered persecution for generations farming, basically illiterate, including my grandfather Lord local, but also illiterate. I'm not illiterate, but the genes are still farmers, friends say I look like farmers, this is not to belittle me.